In the Duolingo lessons about possessives (skills Possess 1, Possess 2, To have 1, To have 2, Plural possessions, and Choices 5), you learn about the possessive suffixes. The forms are as follows:
Hungarian | English | |
---|---|---|
1SG | -öm, -em, -om, -m | my |
2SG | -öd, -ed, -od, -d | your (sg.) |
3SG | -je, -ja, -e, -a | his/her/its |
1PL | -ünk, -unk, -nk | our |
2PL | -(ö)tök, -(e)tek, -(o)tok | your (pl.) |
3PL | -jük, -juk, -ük, -uk | their |
Sometimes the j sound is not needed, like asztala, asztaluk, but it is not what I'm talking about today. But rather the 3rd person plural. It behaves strangely.
The Tips & Notes say:
Exceptions
As usual, there are a few exceptions to the general rule. When the possessor is third person plural, the forms change in one of two ways. First, when the possessor is a pronoun, ők ‘they’, the pronoun loses its -k. (This only happens with ők, all other pronouns stay intact.)
az ő cipőjük ‘their shoe’
az ő asztaluk ‘their table’
So it looks like a singular possessor, but is still plural. Second, when the possessor is a noun in the plural, like a lányok, the possessed noun loses its plural ending -(j)uk or -(j)ük
a lányok cipője ‘the girls' shoe’
a lányok asztala ‘the girls' table'
How does it work in general?
First, we have to make a distinction. Do we have a Possessive sentence, like The boy's dog is black. A fiú kutyája fekete.
or a to have sentence: The boy has a dog. A fiúnak van egy kutyája.
So, in total:
Possessive sentence | To have sentence | |
---|---|---|
they | -juk | -juk |
az ő kutyájuk | (nekik) van egy kutyájuk | |
their dog | they have a dog | |
plural noun | -ja | -juk* |
a fiúk kutyája, a fiúknak a kutyája | a fiúknak van egy kutyájuk | |
the boys' dog | the boys have a dog | |
önök, maguk | -ja | -juk* |
az önök kutyája | önöknek van egy kutyájuk | |
your dog | you have a dog | |
not named | -juk | -juk |
a kutyájuk | van egy kutyájuk | |
(their/your) dog | (they/you) have a dog |
Starred ones:
Here you saw that TO HAVE sentences use -juk. Well... it is not that simple. It is a topic people argue about. Several native Hungarians use -ja in to have sentences, in those cases where you would use -ja in the possessive sentences. For me, the -ja version sounds more natural.
Duolingo sentences usually use -juk in these cases. But both versions are accepted.
Links (in Hungarian)
http://www.e-nyelv.hu/2010-09-15/birtokos-szemelyjelek-egyeztetese-2/
http://www.e-nyelv.hu/2017-03-21/birtokos-szemelyjelek-egyeztetese-9/
https://www.nyest.hu/hirek/a-valtozasoknak-is-van-elonye
http://seas3.elte.hu/delg/publications/modern_talking/112.html
A similar logic can be used, when the possessed thing is also plural:
Possessive sentence | To have sentence | |
---|---|---|
they | -ik | -ik |
az ő kutyáik | (nekik) vannak kutyáik | |
their dogs | they have dogs | |
plural noun | -i | -ik* |
a fiúk kutyái, a fiúknak a kutyái | a fiúknak vannak kutyáik | |
the boys' dogs | the boys have dogs | |
önök, maguk | -i | -ik* |
az önök kutyái | önöknek vannak kutyáik | |
your dogs | you have dogs | |
not named | -ik | -ik |
a kutyáik | vannak kutyáik | |
(their/your) dogs | (they/you) have dogs |
No comments:
Post a Comment